Predictions
for the 2006 Season
[Editor's Note:
"Prime Time" Johnny Maz, who has written this column since
2001, is AWOL this year. We hope he's back for the next round! So I
had to fill in for him. I wrote this on April 24, about 3 weeks into
the season.]
National
League standings as of 4/23 |
East |
Central |
West |
12-6
|
|
Mets |
13-5
|
|
Astros
WC |
10-8
|
|
Rockies |
9-9
|
|
Braves |
12-7
|
|
Reds |
10-8
|
|
Giants |
7-10
|
|
Phillies |
11-7
|
|
Cards |
9-10
|
|
Dodgers |
7-11
|
|
Nationals |
10-7
|
|
Cubs |
8-10
|
|
Padres |
5-11
|
|
Marlins |
9-10
|
|
Brewers |
8-11
|
|
D-Backs |
|
|
|
5-15
|
|
Pirates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.L. East
The Mets
jumped off to a quick start, going 9-2 and opening up an early 5 game
lead on perennial division champs the Braves.
The Phils
stumbled out of the gate, and the dismantled Marlins
and owner-less Nationals
are afterthoughts. As of today, Atlanta is 3 back. Okay, I still like
the Braves to win the division. The Mets' pitching looks good on paper
with Pedro
and Glavine,
but they are fragile and old, in that order. And who do they really
have beyond the big two? Sure their hitting is better, so they should
contend for the wild card spot. And the Phils are all bark and no bite,
with the added handicap of the worst manager in baseball, Charlie
Manuel.
N.L. Central
In the last two years, the Astros
have dug a big hole, and then climbed out of it in the second half to
make the wild card. This year it looks like Clemens has retired, and
Andy
Pettitte is off to a slow start, but they've opened at 13-5 and
have a small lead over the Reds,
Cards,
and Cubs.
You can count on low-payroll Cincy to fade and overrated Dusty
Baker to mismanage the Cubbies. (And forget about Milwaukee
and Pittsburgh;
they've been non-competitive for a decade.) I think over the course
of a long season, St. Louis will once again capture the division crown,
but I have to go with Houston to edge out the Mets for the wild card.
And if Clemens comes back mid-season or Pettitte gets it going, watch
out!
N.L. West
This division is an embarrassment. Believe it or not, the Colorado
Rockies have the early lead at 10-8 with my Giants.
Last year's champ the Padres
are at 8-10, but I don't give them much of a shot to repeat. The Dodgers
and D-Backs
aren't ready for prime time. I'll take the Giants by default (and I
hope Barry
Bonds has a miserable season, or better yet, hangs up the cleats
for good).
back
to top
American
League standings as of 4/23 |
East |
Central |
West |
12-7
|
|
Red Sox
|
13-5
|
|
Chi Sox
|
10-9
|
|
Angels |
11-9
|
|
Orioles |
12-7
|
|
Tigers |
10-9
|
|
Rangers |
9-8
|
|
Yankees |
10-9
|
|
Indians
WC |
8-11
|
|
A's |
9-8
|
|
Blue
Jays |
7-11
|
|
Twins |
7-13
|
|
Mariners |
8-11
|
|
Devil
Rays |
4-13
|
|
Royals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.L. East
The Yankees
have once again gotten off to a slow start, although not as bad as last
year's 11-19. And the Red
Sox have the early lead with newcomer Josh
Beckett and a healthy Curt
Schilling. I don't see the aging Bronx Bombers being able to run
down Boston every year, plus the divisional schedule should be harder
this year with the improved Blue
Jays, Orioles,
and even Devil
Rays. So you've read it here first: the Yankees will not take the
division. And that starting rotation is even more suspect than their
cross town rivals. Dinosaur Randy
Johnson can't go on, and their newbie flashes of last year can't
possibly duplicate those gaudy records. Their big addition this year
was Johnny
Damon. So what? I think this is the end of the line for the Yankees
no playoffs this year!
A.L. Central
The White
Sox have picked up where they left off last year, with the improved
Tigers
right on their tail. You have to like Chicago with all that pitching.
I think the Indians,
who flopped down the stretch last year, should be able to get over the
hump and capture the wild card. After all, they get to play a lot of
games against Triple A Kansas
City. And Minnesota?
Not sure if they can keep up the pace this year.
A.L. West
In today's Major League Baseball, we have 30 teams and 6 divisions.
A casual observer would think that means 5 teams in each division. No
sir! We've got the NL Central with 6, and here we have the AL West with
only 4. Texas
won't be good again, and Seattle
hasn't improved. So that means it's another battle between Oakland
and the California
(or is it Anaheim, or Los Angeles?) Angels. Any way you slice it, this
high payroll team should have enough to hold off the always competitive
A's. But it will be close.
Marty
"The Commissioner"
see
also around the horn: 2005
| 2004 | 2003
| 2002 | 2001
back
to top