back
to basketball
send
questions
or comments to
the
Commissioner
Miami
Heat
official site
|
|
NBA.com
see
hockey's:
|
|
Predictions for the 2007 Playoffs
back to:
basketball | playoff
contest | playoff grid
It was
a very unpredictable year, and we ended up with our head barely
above water, at 8-7. Wait til next year!
Finally, it's
time for the Finals. It's a dreadful end to a dreadful playoff
season. At least we have a rooting interest in Cleveland, with
the next annointed one, Lebron James, plus one of my favorite
players, Eric Snow. The Finals would have been unwatchable if
the thuggish Pistons (and the poster boy for millioinaire crybabies,
Chris Webber) had matched up with the thuggish Spurs. This style
of play, which is officiated against all year long,
gets a pass in the playoffs, to the consternation of true NBA
fans everywhere. Stern has got to go.
Anyway, despite the fact I'd like the Cavs to win, this isn't
their time yet. Lebron really doesn't have an All-Star sidekick,
and he can't carry the Cavs by himself against the stifling Spurs'
defense, which will play smarter than Detroit. So I'll say it's
Spurs in 5. Easier than expected!
Man, this
is an ugly playoff year. I went 2-2 last round, so I'm at 6-6
overall. Before we get to the Conference Finals, I have a few
words about the second round.
First, Vince Carter is done. Cooked, shot, over the hill. He is
the big brother of Allen Iverson. It's all dribble, dribble, dribble,
and then throw up a ridiculous shot and hope to get fouled. He
went 4-11 in Game 6. Not exactly scintillating basketball. VC
is up for a new contract this summer. We know Rod Thorn will do
the right thing. Unload this load.
In the West, we thoroughly enjoyed the Jazz-Warriors series. Very
entertaining. But the Suns-Spurs was the biggest rip-off in years.
The NBA, in its "wisdom", decided to suspend Stoudemire
and Diaw for leaving the bench during the Horry/Nash "incident".
This obviously handed the series to the Spurs, despite the Suns'
valiant effort in Game 5. Everyone says this rule is "black
and white". But the rule clearly is subject to interpretation,
in two ways. Let's look at the actual rule. The rule states "During
an ALTERCATION, all players not participating in the game must
remain in the immediate VICINITY of their bench." (emphasis added).
Was the Horry foul the altercation? No! Stoudemire and Diaw reacted
to the foul, not the ensuing pushing and shoving by Bell, etc.
(that was the altercation). This is EXACTLY what Duncan did earlier
in the game: he got off his bench and reacted to the hard foul
on his teammate. And what exactly is "vicinity"? The play occurred
very close to the Suns' bench. If Nash had been shoved INTO the
Suns' bench, could the players move away, or would that also be
leaving the bench?
Compare this to the Baron Davis elbow to Derek Fisher's temple
near the end of their Game 4. The rules pertaining to that incident
are "A player must be ejected for an elbow foul which makes contact
above shoulder level. Even if a punch or an elbow goes undetected
by the officials during the game, but is detected during a review
of a videotape, that player will be penalized." And "Whether or
not said player is ejected, a fine not exceeding $35,000 and/or
suspension may be imposed upon such player by the Commissioner
at his sole discretion." Why was Baron Davis not suspended for
his flagrant physical contact, while Stoudemire and Diaw were
suspended for standing up and taking a few steps, and yet never
actually reaching the altercation? The inconsistency is maddening.
People wonder why the NBA ratings are down, year after year. Maybe
real basketball fans are tired of the thuggery of the "Bad Boy"
Pistons, then the 90s Knicks and Heat, and now the Spurs, and
how the league lets them get away with it year after year. The
NBA must stand for No Brains + Arrogance.
back to top
Conference Finals
East
Pistons
(1) vs. Cavaliers (2): I guess this is the series everyone
should have expected, with the 1 seed up against the 2 seed. The
Pistons seem much more determined than last year. We'll give the
Cavs one game because they have a league annointed "star"
Lebron James, and another game because the Pistons tend to let
up when they're ahead in a series. Wake me when it's over.
Pistons in 6. I'm actually glad Cleveland
won!
West
Spurs
(3) vs. Jazz (4): I think it says in the NBA rulebook that
a team that missed the playoffs last year cannot go to the NBA
Finals the next year. So the Jazz have the playoff learning curve
to overcome here. They've been a lot of fun to watch, and I'll
be rooting for them hard, but they're not getting by the grind
it out and knock 'em down Spurs.
Spurs in 6. Wait til next year!
back to top
What a brutal first round, where I went a humbling 4-4. What is
this, the NHL playoffs? Not only do my Mavs fail to show up, but
the Shaqster goes out in a sweep. I'm not sure what I was thinking
picking Toronto, but the truth be told, I was rooting for the
Jazz to knock off Houston. Oh well, on to round 2.
East
Pistons
(1) vs. Bulls (5): While the Bulls surprised me in the first
round, they played a banged up Heat squad that was the perfect
opponent for them. Now they have to play the varsity, and I like
they're gonna get thumped.
Pistons in 5. Okay, 6.
Cavaliers
(2) vs. Nets (6): The Cavs had a free ride in the first round
over the really beat up Wizards. There's something still missing
with Cleveland, and the Nets have the veteran grizzle that I overlooked
against the Raptors. Lebron is better than Bosh, but there's not
much else there that should present a problem. I think New Jersey
will get the job done here.
Nets in 6. Not exactly.
West
Suns
(2) vs. Spurs (3): This is the only series that was anticipated
before round 1. It should be a classic matchup of speed and offense
versus pound it in and defense. I think the home court advantage
makes the difference here.
Suns in 7. Ripped off!
Jazz
(4) vs. Warriors (8): It is amazing that a 4 vs. 8 should
set up the most intriguing matchup of the second round. After
the Dallas flameout, everyone is acting like this Warrior team
can't be beaten. But Utah has a lot more grit than the very soft
Mavericks. Repeat after me: Carlos Boozer is not Dirk Nowitzki.
And there's no way Golden State continues to shoot lights out
from the arc. (Note: Mike W says the Warriors win this in 3,
with David Stern calling off game 4 for the good of the league.)
But I say the clock strikes midnight for Cinderella.
Jazz in 5. Yes sir!
back to top
We're back for another exciting season of NBA playoff basketball!
Here are my picks for the first round:
East
Pistons
(1) vs. Magic (8): There isn't much to say here, except perhaps
that Detroit
is not as good as last year without Ben
Wallace. The Magic
are young and feisty, but they're no match for the veteran boys
from Motown.
Pistons in 4. Exactly correct!
Cavaliers
(2) vs. Wizards (7): This would have been an extremely entertaining
series, setting up a rematch from last year with Lebron
vs. the Hibachi.
Alas, with injuries severely depleting the Wizards,
there isn't much left to entertain. This is a mopping up operation
for Cleveland.
I'll give the Wiz one game for grit.
Cavaliers in 5. No mercy in 4.
Raptors
(3) vs. Nets (6): A couple of years ago, Vince
Carter pretty much forced a trade out of Toronto.
Now, the sneaker is on the other foot. It's the Nets
who are banged up and the underdogs facing division champion Toronto.
Although playing a little better lately, New Jersey never really
clicked all season long. This should be a hard fought series,
with the more talented youngsters pushing hard against a grizzled
Nets team. In the end, I'll bet on the most talented player on
the court: Chris
Bosh.
Raptors in 7. Not sure what I was thinking.
Heat
(4) vs. Bulls (5): Here's another great rematch from last
year. While the Bulls
have added Ben
Wallace, the creaky Heat
are hoping Dwyane
Wade can shake off the rust and the aches to lead them back
to the promised land. I thought the Ben Wallace acquisition would
have moved Chicago to elite status, but it hasn't exactly worked
out that way. They are very inconsistent, and as long as Shaq
is still patrolling the paint, I'll take the . . .
Heat in 6. Dreadful effort.
back to top
West
Mavericks
(1) vs. Warriors (8): Here is yet another homecoming style
matchup, with Don
"Nellie" Nelson coming back to take on former pupil
Avery
Johnson and the top team in the league, the Dallas
Mavericks. It is nice to see Golden
State back in the playoffs after a long drought, and I love
their up-tempo, helter skelter style of play. The Warriors swept
the season series, and Nellie will give Dirk
Nowitzki fits. In the end the better team will prevail, but
it won't be a walkover like last year's opening round.
Mavericks in 6. This was hard to take.
Suns
(2) vs. Lakers (7): We have a rivalry brewing here. I can't
wait to see Raja
Bell get in Kobe's
grill again. For some reason, the Lakers
struggled down the stretch. The Suns
have too many weapons and they're on a mission to go farther than
last year. But this still should be a war.
Suns in 6. Even sweeter in 5.
Spurs
(3) vs. Nuggets (6): Boy, I don't like this Denver
team. I know they've been on a roll the last few weeks, but in
crunch time, look for Iverson
and Melo
to fight for the ball among themselves! And with
nitwit Joey Crawford safely out of the way this postseason, I
look for Tim
Duncan to have his best playoffs ever. The Spurs
look like a real wrecking crew.
Spurs in 4. A few nervous moments early.
Jazz
(4) vs. Rockets (5): A month ago, I would have picked the
upstart Jazz
to knock off a Houston
team with both Yao
and McGrady
coming back from injuries. But Utah has slipped and the Rockets
surpassed them in won-loss record to secure home court advantage
in the weird NBA playoff format. Sloan
and Van
Gundy are both hall of fame coaches, and Boozer
and company have a lot of pride. I think this one will go the
distance, with McGrady finally getting out of the first round.
Rockets in 7. Okay, go Jazz!
back to top
The Commissioner
|
|
|