back to basketball

send questions
or comments to

the Commissioner


NJ Nets
official site


NBA.com


see hockey's:

-
Predictions for the 2002 Playoffs

back to: basketball | playoff contest | playoff grid

Another year, another 10-5 season for me!


And now, it's on to The Finals!
Well, I almost got it perfectly right in the conference finals, except that the Kings couldn't make their free throws, and the Lakers played 8 vs. 5 (yes, I'm counting the referees!). Now I'm 9-5, heading into the big show:

Nets (East 1) vs. Lakers (West 3): Well, the Nets have had a great run, and the Lakers have looked more vulnerable than they have in years. Still, it's hard to overlook the fact that the Lakers beat the best team in the league this year, Sacramento, including winning game 7 on the road. In the Finals, L.A. has home court advantage, and once again they'll get every call. The Nets are game, and have a better all around team, but will come up a little short.
Lakers in 6. The sweep hurts.


Here's my analysis of Round 3, the Conference Finals:

By now you may be thinking, "What does Marty know about basketball?" I went 2-2 in the 2nd round, making me 8-4 overall. But I have my excuses. Mashburn's mysterious illness certainly killed the Hornets, and no one knew he would miss the entire series with the Nets. And the Mavs were in almost every game, but couldn't make the big plays down the stretch. The real killer was game 4, with Webber and Divac fouling out, and Stojakovic spraining his ankle, but the Kings still found a way to win. Oh well, I still must go on:

East
Nets (1) vs. Celtics (3): Now I am a believer. The Nets are playing beautiful team ball, and Captain Kidd won't let this team lose. This will be a lot of fun, but the two headed monster in Boston can't be enough to match New Jersey's balanced attack.
Nets in 7. N-E-T-S, Nets, Nets, Nets!

West
Kings (1) vs. Lakers (3): The Lakers are still formidable, running right through the so-called MVP in San Antonio in 5 games, even with a banged up Shaq. But Sacramento is feeling it, looking confident, and had an equally easy series with the high flying Mavericks. This will be an unbelievable, epic battle. I'm counting on Predrag contributing by game 3, because I'm taking the:
Kings in 7. Close, but no cigar.

back to top


Here's my analysis of Round 2:

Well we took it on the chin in the Nets/Pacers series, going into double overtime before being knocked off. And of course we got smoked in game 5 of the Boston- Philly series. So we're only 6-2 in the first round. Nevertheless, we plunge boldly into our second round predictions:

East
Nets (1) vs. Hornets (4): Yes, the Nets surprised me in getting by the Pacers. Reggie Miller did what I expected, but his supporting cast, especially Jermaine O'Neal, were mostly AWOL for the series. But the Hornets are a different animal. They have a solid starting lineup at every position and a deep bench. They have a very good shot even if Mashburn misses some games. And they have the playoff experience to get it done. No surprises this round.
Hornets in 6. No Mash hurt a lot.

Pistons (2) vs. Celtics (3): Both teams here have little in the way of playoff experience, but one of them has to advance to the conference finals by default. The Pistons underwhelmed me in their first round series with Toronto, while the Celtics showed me something in knocking off the Eastern Conference champs. If Boston can continue to shoot the lights out, Detroit will have trouble here.
Celtics in 6. Even better!

West
Kings (1) vs. Mavericks (4): No doubt about it, this will be the most entertaining series in maybe the last five years. Both teams can score in bunches from every position on the floor. But I think the Mavs have more scorers than the Kings, plus they have the best player on the floor: Dirk Nowitzki.
Mavericks in 6. What do Dairy Queen and the Mavs have in common? Soft.

Lakers (3) vs. Spurs (2): Not much to say here. The Lakers are still the Lakers, and the Spurs are still the Spurs, plus they may have to play without David Robinson. Duncan can't do it alone. Another year, but the same result. We'll be charitable and give the Spurs one game.
Lakers in 5. Exactly!

back to top


Here's my analysis of Round 1:

East
Nets (1) vs. Pacers (8): These two teams have a lot of young exciting players, most of whom have never been to the playoffs before. The only exceptions are Jason Kidd (undoubtedly the league's MVP this year) and Reggie Miller (one of the all time clutch guys in the playoffs. While the Nets ran roughshod over the East throughout the year, the playoffs are a different matter. The Pacers have been fighting for their lives the last few weeks, and have come through battle hardened and tested. This will be a hard fought series, with Mr. Clutch proving his mettle in the end.
Pacers in 5. I was oh so close here!

Pistons (2) vs. Raptors (7): While Toronto has had an unbelievable run without Vince Carter just to get into the playoffs, the Pistons are for real. Stack is playing some of the best basketball of his career, and Ben Wallace will have his way inside.
Pistons in 4. A struggle, but a win.

Celtics (3) vs. SIxers (6): Mark this down: With or without Iverson, there is no way the Sixers are going out in the first round to a Boston team that has never seen the playoffs, except on TV. The Sixers with Iverson (who I expect to play on Sunday) will play unselfishly, quarterbacked by the very underrated Snowman at point. When the Sixers suit up their top 6 players for this series, it won't even be close.
Sixers in 3. Or Not!

Hornets (4) vs. Magic (5): This should be a very entertaining series, with the forgotten Charlotte franchise already halfway out the door and heading to the Big Easy next season. The Magic are young and fun to watch, but essentially have one marquee player in T-Mac, while the Hornets are a veteran team who blitzed the Heat last year in the first round and pushed the Bucks to the limit.
Hornets in 5. Even easier than expected.

back to top

West
Kings (1) vs. Jazz (8): A couple of years ago, it used to be that the Kings couldn't beat the Jazz when it counted. Stockton or Malone would always step up and break Sacramento's heart. But that was then, and now the Kings are on the fast track to elite status. They'll go over Utah like it's nothing more than a speed bump.
Kings in 3. The Jazz still have moxie, but not enough players.

Spurs (2) vs. Sonics (7): After last year's disintegration against the Lakers, I thought the Spurs would have to revamp. They didn't, but they are peaking for the playoffs, having caught the front running Mavericks and taken the division title. Seattle has been the surprise team in the West this year, with the Glove settling his differences and taking new owner Howard Schultz's team into the playoffs for the first time. Maybe it's the caramel macchiatos! But in the end, it's the:
Spurs in 4. Injuries could undo the Spurs.

Lakers (3) vs. Blazers (6): A couple of years ago, the Blazers were 10 minutes away from beating the Lakers in game 7 of the Western Conference Finals. But they choked it away, wandered around last year, and finally got it together this year. They're a respectable team this year, but the Diesel is unstoppable in the paint.
Lakers in 4. A romp!

Mavericks (4) vs. Timberwolves (5): Will the T-Wolves ever get home court advantage in the playoffs? This year they had a chance, but hit the skids and are once again the 5th seed. The Mavericks also looked a little soft down the stretch. In the end, I think Dirk has a better supporting cast than KG, and the homecourt advantage counts for something.
Mavericks in 4. Much easier than expected!

back to top

— The Commissioner